There is at social networks one problem... A problem of continuation of dialogue.
See: there is a network, well good..., have met, have made friends, souvenirs have exchanged, and is farther what for in this network to come? I.e. we begin made a kitchen garden, we cost(stand) services around (and for) that people which has come to this network. The very first, that comes in brain – thematic blog... Anything new, simply next reincarnation of forums. Everyone invents a bicycle in own way, but blog is everywhere.
Question to public whom this delirium reads: What it is possible to fasten to a social network that people in it(her) came back?
Ideas:
In a social network it is the easiest to unite no lethally, but chronically sick people, them only in one place collect, enable to communicate and they will fray the general(common) sores years.
Social networks around of search of job are doomed for extinction or transformation in social networks of professionals, i.e. to go it is necessary not in the parties(sides) of search of job, and aside the help to other people to find the necessary contacts when already job is found. Here most likely it is necessary to look aside " clubs on interests ". Only not everyone it will be possible to help the direct competitor (as against patients who for experience each other keep and pass by word of mouth). Around of business to sharpen social. The network is more complex(difficult), since money, and not virtual, but real money here can interfere...
The network should have all adjustments to default revolved aside of increase of quantity(amount) of active contacts. The difference between ?? and ya.ru consists that in ?? at the expense of the mechanism communities the quantity(amount) of active personal contacts (biassedly) decreased since one has created comunity, and others write to him(it) and thus leave in the public, leaving the diary for itself. In ??? that me have read, I need to create comunity around of itself, i.e. initially I need to search to itself for friends, to be more open. Here there are no modes of reading (friends only, etc.), that besides enables to think, or to write for everything, or to not write in general. In my understanding comunity to do(make) there is no sense, with them on the contrary it is necessary to struggle. Say, in what I am wrong?

|